Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JB Holston's avatar

This is good from Harvard's Managing the Future of Work Joseph Fuller : ""AI will create the data that will allow us to do a whole lot more skills-based hiring by eliminating the taxonomy problem we have in the U.S. We don’t have the 8K employer committees in Switzerland. There are literally 8K committees that define what are the skills associated with each major job. And we don’t have federally controlled K-12 education, which provides some countries with a leg up. But when you’ve got AI looking out there, and a program director at company X and a project manager at company Y and a director at company Z—the people who occupy those jobs per LinkedIn all look pretty similar. And the job descriptions of those jobs have the same keywords. They’re really the same job.

Let’s say I’m running a multi-hundred thousand employee company, UPS let’s say. Now I can say what are the attributes of people who got promoted rapidly. And it isn’t, they went to Harvard or they went to Caltech or something. You’ll find, by the way, often they had highly rated supervisors. That’s going to allow us to match skills and experiences more accurately and to not rely on proxies like degrees or grade point averages or even the proxy of what someone currently makes or how fast they’ve gotten promoted on their résumé, but more legitimately based in an examination of what backgrounds seem to correlate with success and help with the upward mobility questions." https://workshift.opencampusmedia.org/the-future-of-opportunity-a-conversation-with-harvards-joseph-fuller/?utm_source=the-job.beehiiv.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=how-workers-rise

Expand full comment
JB Holston's avatar

WaPo, w/ similar sentiments: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/12/12/ai-chatgpt-universities-learning/ "There is no better place to see the promise and the peril of generative artificial intelligence playing out than in academia. "

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts